The position of digital fabrication in architecture:

Document Type : Original/Research Article

Authors

Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and urbanism, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the scientific and theoretical field of digital fabrication has been influenced by an positivist determination based on a linear realism, which expresses its epistemological attitude. Without a critical encounter in the scope of epistemology, it is not possible to propose an alternative to this dominant understanding that determines the place of digital fabrication in architecture. In response to the question, "what is the alternative to the dominant understanding of digital fabrication?" and with the aim of determining the place of digital fabrication in architecture, this article has used critical discourse analysis in a qualitative framework , which consists of three parts:
- The first part, in a horizontal section of the alternative discourse, Synchronously analyzes the existing background in criticizing the dominant understanding epistemology; In a holistic approach to the current state of the field of digital fabrication, the proposals illustrate a range in redefining of digital understanding.
- The second part, in a vertical section of the alternative discourse, by criticizing the dominant method of determining digital history in architecture, diachornically refers to a part of history from the 1960s that has been omitted in conventional history; In a historical approach, the proposals of this alternative flow render an extension in the recovery of digital understanding.
- The third part compares the alternative proposals Synchronously and diachornically both resulting from two horizontal and vertical cutting of the alternative discourse body. The results of this comparison show that both parts of the discourse analysis agree on leaving the place of digital technology in the representation of architecture and entering the field of intelligent digital architecture.
Finally, the critical examination of the results of this investigation indicates the existence of an assumption that considers exiting the scope of representation in architecture to be equivalent to entering the field of intelligent digital architecture. The conclusion of this article, while determining the position of digital fabrication in architecture and also specifying fabrication knowledge in relation to this alternative discourse, raises critical questions that need to be addressed at a theoretical level. Otherwise, the results of the alternative discourse, in the absence of answers to these critical questions, will produce another type of the dominant discourse that the alternative discourse was created in response to. In this way, the proposal of new topics in this alternative discourse will be caught in a round of futility.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 

براون، ام.ان و ام.کیلی، ا. (۱۳۹۴) راهنمای تفکر نقادانه-پرسیدن سوال‌های به‌جا. (ترجمه: کوروش کامیاب) تهران: مینوی خرد.
حسنی‌فر، ع. و امیری پریان، ف. (۱۳۹۲). تحلیل‌گفتمان به‌مثابۀ روش. جستارهای سیاسی معاصر, ۵(۱۱), ۴۹-۶۷.
میرفخرائی، ت. (۱۳۸۳). فرآیند گفتمان. تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی، مرکز مطالعات رسانه.
Bottazzi, R. (2018). Digital architecture beyond computers : fragments of a cultural history of computational design. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Canizares, G. (2019). Digital Fabrications: Designer Stories for a Software-Based Planet. ORO Editions/Applied Research & Design.
Carpo, M. (2016). Parametric Notations: The Birth of the Non-Standard. Architectural Design, 86(2), 24–29. doi: 10.1002/ad.2020
Carpo, M. (2017). The second digital turn : design beyond intelligence.
Frazer, J. (1993). The architectural relevance of cybernetics. Systems Research, 10(3), 43–48. doi: 10.1002/sres.3850100307
Frazer, J. (1995). An Evolutionary Architecture. Architectural Association (Great Britain). School of Architecture. Retrieved from http://www.johnfrazer.com/author.html
Grobman, Y. J., & Neuman, E. (2012). Performalism : Form and Performance in Digital Architecture. Routledge.
Kale, V. (2019). Digital Transformation of Enterprise Architecture (V. Kale (ed.)). CRC Press.
Lorenzo-Eiroa, P., & Sprecher, A. (2013). Architecture in Formation : On the Nature of Information in Digital Architecture. In Architecture in Formation. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315890128
McCullough, M. (1996). Abstracting craft : the practiced digital hand. MIT Press.
McCullough, M. (2004). Digital ground : architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/digitalgroundarc0000mccu
McCullough, M. (2013). Ambient commons : attention in the age of embodied information. The MIT Press.
Mitchell, W. J. (1995). City of Bits | Space, Place, and the Infobahn. The MIT Press. Retrieved from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/city-bits
Mitchell, W. J. (1999). e-topia | Urban Life, Jim—But Not As We Know It. The MIT Press. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/etopiaurbanlifej00mitc/page/n7/mode/2up
Mitchell, W. J. (2003). Me++ | The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. The MIT Press. Retrieved from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/me
Mitchell, W. J., & McCullough, M. (2000). Digital Design Media (pp. 37–67). Springer, London. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0729-3_3
Negroponte, N. (1970). The Architecture Machine: Toward a more human environment. The MIT Press. Negroponte, N. (1975). Soft architecture machines. The MIT Press.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital. The MIT Press.
Pask, G. (1969). The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetics. Architectural Design.
Picon, A. (2010). Digital culture in architecture : an introduction for the design professions. Birkhäuser.
Picon, A. (2014). Ornament: the politics of architecture and subjectivity. In wiley. wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781118658321
Picon, A. (2015). Smart cities : a spatialised intelligence. wiley.
Picon, A., & Fok, W. W. (2016). Digital property : open-source architecture.
Picon, A., & Ponte, A. (2003). Architecture and the Sciences: Exchanging Metaphors. New York, N.Y. :;Princeton, N.J. : Princeton Architectural Press ;;Princeton University School of Architecture,.
Retsin, G., Morel, P., Koehler, D. (Urbanist), Claypool, M., Menges, A., Carpo, M., Ago, V., Trotter, M., & Leach, N. (2019). Discrete : reappraising the digital in architecture.
Sadler, S. (2005). Archigram: Architecture without Architecture. The MIT Press.
Vidler, A. (2000). Warped space : art, architecture, and anxiety in modern culture. MIT Press.