The rise of aesthetics in the theory and practice of architecture: A Study in the origin of the relationship of architecture with aesthetics

Document Type : Original/Research Article

Authors

1 Architecture Faculty. Tehran University of Art

2 Faculty of architecture, university of art

3 faculty of architecture, university of art

Abstract

Aesthetics emerged in the views of eighteenth-century Western philosophers as a branch of philosophy that judges the beautiful and focuses on the arts. From that time, these philosophers also paid attention to architecture. However, the term entered architectural theory about a century later. Theorists have mentioned the two main factors that have given rise to the emergence of architectural aesthetics in this period: the achievement in "visual arts" and the dominance of "rational-logical" thinking on the theory and practice of architecture. An issue that has received less attention in this research is the different roles of these two factors in the emergence of architectural aesthetics. The question of the research is "What role have each of these factors played in the emergence of architectural aesthetics?" The methodology of the research is that first, we expressed the origin and basic concepts of aesthetics in the eyes of the founders. Then, we express the conflict between Aestheticians' approach and the views of architects and architectural theorists about beauty. Afterward, we show how the reaction to the rational-logical method created a desire among architects and theorists to relate to aesthetics. Finally, we argued about how the mediation of the visual arts paved the way for the relationship between architecture and aesthetics.

The result shows that under the influence of rational-logical thinking, architects and theorists tried to explain the place of architecture as a science and not a kind of art. The purpose of architecture, to create a place for the perfect way of living with all complicated aspects, was reduced to fulfilling the physical functions and aspects of architecture that can be expressed in the program and structure. In response to the reductionist approach, a desire to go beyond emerged among architects and theorists. They thought that if the task of architecture is anything more than serving the practical needs of everyday life, we could find the answer to the relationship between art and architecture. However, due to differences in architects' view of beauty and Aestheticians' view about the relationship between arts and beauty, the aesthetics of architecture was not made by referring to philosophical topics. Aesthetics of architecture requires a shift in judging beauty from the role of practical and moral functions to the mere form. This paradigm shift was mediated by the visual arts which do not belong to the practical and moral considerations. As a result, we approve of the idea that the dominance of "rational-logical" thinking and the "visual arts", played different roles in the rise of aesthetics of architecture. The reaction to the first one created a desire for architects to relate to aesthetics. The second provided the means to fulfill this desire.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • الکساندر، کریستوفر. (1394). معماری و راز جاودانگی. ترجمۀ مهرداد قیومی بیدهندی. تهران: روزنه.
  • پل، گایر. (1394). زیبایی شناسی آلمانی در قرن هجدهم (دانشنامۀ فلسفۀ استنفورد ج 30). ترجمۀ سید مسعود حسینی. تهران: ققنوس.
  • کاسیرر، ارنست. (1373). فلسفۀ روشن­اندیشی. ترجمۀ نجف دریابندری. تهران: خوارزمی.
  • گات، بریس و‌ لوپس، دومینیک. (1385). دانشنامۀ زیبایی­شناسی. گروه مترجمان. تهران: فرهنگستان هنر.
  • گیدیون، زیگفرید. (1365). فضا، زمان، و معماری. ترجمۀ منوچهر مزینی. تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
  • ریتر، یوآخیم؛ گروندر، کارلفرید؛ گابریل، گتفرید. (1389). فرهنگ‌نامه تاریخی مفاهیم فلسفه: فلسفه هنر (جلد 1). با ویراستاری محمدرضا حسینی بهشتی و بهمن پازوکی. تهران: موسسۀ پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفۀ ایران.
  • نزبیت، کیت. (1393). تئوری معماری پست مدرن (جلد اول: پیش درآمد). ترجمۀ پویان روحی. تهران: کتابکدۀ کسری.
  • ونزل، کریستین هلموت. (1395). مسائل و مفاهیم کلیدی زیباشناسی کانت. ترجمۀ داوود میرزایی و مانیا نوریان. تهران: حکمت.
  • وینترز، ادوارد. (1396). زیبایی­شناسی و معماری. ترجمۀ عبدالله سالاروند، تهران: نقش جهان.
  • Alberto, Perez-Gomez. (1983). Architecture and the Crisis of Modern Science. Cambridge: MIT Pr.
  • Capon, David Smith. (1999). Architectural theory. Chichester, New York: John Wiley.
  • Ulrich, Conrads. (1975). Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture. Ed by Michael Bullock. Cambridge: MIT Pr.
  • Crysler, C. Greig; Cairns, Stephen; Heynen, Hilde. (2012). The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE Publications.
  • Forty, Adrian. (2004). Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. New York: Thames and Hudson.
  • Harris, Karsten. (1998). the Ethical Function of Architecture. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Kivy, Peter. (2004). The Blackwell guide to aesthetics. Malden, MA, Oxford: Blackwell (Blackwell philosophy guides).
  • Kruft, Hanno-Walter. (1994). A history of architectural theory. From Vitruvius to the present. London, New York: Zwemmer; Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Lagueux, Maurice. (2004). "Ethics versus Aesthetics in Architecture". In Philosophical Forum 35 (2), pp. 117–133.
  • Mallgrave, Harry Francis; Contandriopoulos, Christina. (2005-2008). Architectural theory: Volume II - An Anthology from 1871 to 2005. Malden, Mass., Oxford: Blackwell Pub.
  • Scruton, Roger. (1979). the Aesthetics of Architecture. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Wilson, Colin John. (1992). Architectural Reflections: Studies in the Philosophy and Practice of Architecture / St. Colin John Wilson.